“One ecofeminist theory is that capitalist values reflect paternalistic and gendered values. In this interpretation effects of capitalism has led to a harmful split between nature and culture. In the 1970s, early ecofeminists discussed that the split can only be healed by the feminine instinct for nurture and holistic knowledge of nature’s processes.”

“A common claim within ecofeminist literature is that patriarchal structures justify their dominance through binary opposition, these include but are not limited to: heaven/earth, mind/body, male/female, human/animal, spirit/matter, culture/nature and white/non-white. Oppression is reinforced by assuming truth in these binaries and instilling them as ‘marvelous to behold’ through religious and scientific constructs.”

~ from Wikipedia.


and so it moves

forward; on & on & out.

i have finished listening to The Word for World is Forest by Ursula Le Guin and i ache to get back to the twisted roots & tentacles of that place. Sometimes stuffing your brain up with reading lists & podcasts & albums & videos [& more] is just too much like overload. i keep thinking about David Abram & his Spell of the Sensuous, which had a very huge impact on me when i read it; he taught me that we must drop the words & the books, drop all the stuff that fills our head [with stuff] & move back to the animals in order to really connect. it bugs me sometimes that we can get caught up in an artificial world of writing & ideas that talk about connection to nature when actually, instead of turning our attention out into the world as these books tell us to do, all we do is carry on reading about it. it can be like a drug, getting lost in books like that.

“The philosopher Vinciane Despret listened to a singing blackbird one morning — a living blackbird outside her particular window and that way learned what importance sounds like.”

Donna J. Haraway ~ Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. 

i want to write but i write best when i am not writing, when i am not listening to audiobooks, when i am not watching tv or searching on the internet. i write best when i am in the forest & the forest is observing me not writing. i do best when i am not following that wormhole from one thought to another online.

i get excited by ideas & theories, i get turned on by the a-ha moments, overwhelmed by the eurekas; they come thick & fast when i am in the full flow of research; they take me out of myself oh, so quickly, oh, so very swiftly. i forget my real connections & forge false ties with words on a printed page, with bytes on the computer screen.

the blackbird continues to sing outside my window but why am i no longer listening? because i am here instead; because i am inside this machine.

& the more i read, the more i understand that i should stop reading. as Ursula le Guin subtly suggests in her books [& like many other writers have hinted at] the only way to get ourselves out of this mess is to connect – really connect with the world around us. the more i want to write about this connection the more i understand that i should write less. 

once, not so long ago, i did this thing where for four months, i sat in the same spot for at least an hour a day. at first i struggled with it; i could not settle down, i could not find the perfect spot, i could not open my mind to accept the is-ness of the place i was in but then i managed to settle into it. i sat & watched; did nothing else but watch. i watched the sun moving across the sky, i watched the wind move the leaves & i watched the snow melt from the ground, i watched mosquitoes land on my arms & legs & felt them bite. i watched in minuscule detail; everything. there were no books, no podcasts, no internet articles. i went directly to source & i melted away. i started to care passionately about the land, about the birds animals & insects living there. i thought at one point i could & would die for it. really. Ursula would have been proud.

it is so easy to get distracted. my machine is so shiny & fast. it brings me things almost instantaneously. I think that when I am deep online I want for nothing; this is a huge deception; the truth is, it makes me want more & more & more, without any apparent satiety. the answer is always just around the corner. my reading list grows, my inbox fills, my thoughts spiral out of control & suddenly i no longer feel so passionate about this land i have been sitting on for month & months & the worrying thing is, i suddenly want people to know who i am. i want to get published, i want to be important. I feel that people need to listen to what i am talking about & i am unsettled when it feels like no one hears me.

in reality there IS no one listening … but wait, ha ha. how silly I have been! of course there is someone listening. the forest is forever listening & the blackbird, well – always the blackbird.

from all my reading, from all my discussing, from all my writing, I have found that this is the only thing that i can be absolutely sure of; that I can absolutely rely upon & when i have filled myself up with all these important thoughts, when I have typed everything out neatly [& without error], when I am satisfied that a few people may chance upon these words & nod slowly in agreement,

i know that it is only to the forest that I must return.

an observation

Worried. Out on walk this morning saw huge machinery parked in field with a massive rotary cutting blade on the front. I think some trees are going to get chopped in the woods today and I really am not going to be able to cope with it.

when you are deep in the act of becoming things have to continuously move

  1. tentacular* as an entry point:
    earthbound, creature-like, multi-aspectational, reaching out &
    feeling into holes, searching for newer connections, many-twisted
  2. an alternative to the lineal, patriarchal, polarised thinking that
    has dominated western ideology for centuries.
  3. every-direction slipperiness &
    weird thought-nurturing
  4. ‘what am i’ unless that i is itself,
    ambiguous? why be defined?
  5. less defined, more expansive, oceanic:
    more connected to all manner of odd things**
  6. i have been doing it already,
    been doing it in fact, since i was young
    refusing to be defined, though ‘wild’ &
    even that i see, is now an outmoded concept***
  7. i just was never able to put a name to it
    i have been moving from one tentacle to another
  8. the beauty of it
  9. because it does not have to make sense

*used extensively by Donna Haraway in her book ‘Staying With the Trouble: Making Kin in the Cthtulucene’.

**that is why my bio has been made for me by the predictive text on my phone. i have spent a long time with these devices & it is odd that i have yet to connect with their personalities. how comforting it is to know that they too, have a soul that speaks.

***for nothing can be said to be truly wild on this planet if it is being filtered through our naming of it.